NO FURTHER APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL OF DVD JON

An appeal against the acquittal of Norwegian computer wunderkind Jon Lech Johansen, creator of the DeCSS DVD decryption program, was recently dismissed and it has now been announced that he won't be going back to court to face any further appeal.The Norwegian Economic Crime Unit (Økokrim) has confirmed that it will not appeal against the acquittal on copyright infringement charges to Norway's Supreme Court. Økokrim confirmed its withdrawal from the case by failing to lodge an appeal within the requisite deadline. Johansen was alleged to have broken the law by writing and publishing a DVD descrambling program, DeCSS, so that he could watch films he owned on a Linux PC. It earned him the nickname DVD Jon.

The IPKat, having waded through the tortuous text of the first instance decision in Public Prosecutor v Johansen [2003] ECDR 309 (the appeal decision is not yet available in English), is not surprised that there will be no further appeal. The provisions of the Norwegian Penal Code under which the prosecution was brought were drafted long before the current era of sophisticated computing and were plainly not up to the task of securing a conviction.

More on DeCSS here, here and here
Briefs for the USA DeCSS case here, here and here
A DVD about the john

NO FURTHER APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL OF DVD JON NO FURTHER APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL OF DVD JON Reviewed by Jeremy on Tuesday, January 06, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.