REBRANDING OF VICIOUS DOG BREED IS JUST SO MUCH BULL

A report in Ananova claims that New Yorkers are renaming the pit bull terrier in an attempt to improve the dog's frightening image. The city's animal welfare agency has decided to change all its official documents to rename the pit bull the "New Yorkie". It is hoped that the image change will encourage more people to adopt the thousands of pit bulls taken in by the animal shelter each year. At present 90% of the 6,000 pit bulls taken to the New York City Animal Care and Control centre each year are destroyed.

This name change is reportedly the idea of Ed Boks, the new director of the centre. He said he came up with the idea because New Yorkers, like pit bulls, were often thought of as hard or mean, but are actually "some of the most generous and open-hearted people I've ever met". While pit bulls have suffered bad publicity following maulings and attacks, experts maintain that the breed is actually well behaved and that pit bulls outperform golden retrievers in behavioural tests. This is not the first attempt to rebrand pit pulls. In the 1990s San Francisco tried to persuade people to call pit bulls St Francis terriers, but to no avail.

The IPKat is not amused by this rebranding exercise, being firmly of the opinion that a rebranded dog remains a dog. The Pit Bull/New Yorkie may be man’s best friend, but he’s no friend of cats.

Other New Yorkies here, here and here
Real St Francis terriers here
Pit bull jokes hereand here
The Great American Pit Bull Postcard controversy here

REBRANDING OF VICIOUS DOG BREED IS JUST SO MUCH BULL REBRANDING OF VICIOUS DOG BREED IS JUST SO MUCH BULL Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, January 08, 2004 Rating: 5

1 comment:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.