STOP BLOCKING OUR PATH IN EUROPE SAYS NAPSTER TO COLLECTING SOCIETIES

The BBC reports that Chris Gorog, the head of the US music download company Napster, has been complaining that the shenanigans of collecting societies in the various European states have delayed the launch of a European version of the legal incarnation of the Napster site. He blames the hold-up on the complex talks that have to be conducted with the collecting societies in each of the separate states. “As each day passes that Napster isn't operating in Europe, substantial amounts of money are lost to pirates because there is no legal alternative available," he said.

While the IPKat thinks that it’s nice (if ironic) of Mr Gorog to concern himself with the damage to the music industry done by illegal downloaders, he’s not entirely happy with the prospect of the Napster chief’s expectation that he should be granted a licence as of right. Such an expectation is reminiscent of a compulsory licensing scheme. However, the IPKat can see that a licence may be desirable if Napster is the only legal downloading service available and not licensing it will suppress the creation of a new product and downstream market. The IPKat is also somewhat disconcerted by Mr Gorog’s implicit assumption that he should be able to treat Europe as a single party for the purposes of negotiating copyright notices, rather than the sovereign states of which it is made up.

More licences here, here, here, here and here

STOP BLOCKING OUR PATH IN EUROPE SAYS NAPSTER TO COLLECTING SOCIETIES STOP BLOCKING OUR PATH IN EUROPE SAYS NAPSTER TO COLLECTING SOCIETIES Reviewed by Anonymous on Friday, January 30, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.