CFI FORTHCOMING TRADE MARK ATTRACTIONS


Here are some forthcoming trade mark treats from the Court of First Instance, listed on the European Court of Judgment's diary. The CFI will give its decisions this coming Tuesday, 15 February.

* Case T-169/02 Cervecería Modelo v OHIM - Modelo Continente Hipermercados, in which a Community trade mark applicant is appealing against at decision of the OHIM Third Board of Appeal to allow in part an opposition on the basis of a likelihood of confusion.

The mark applied for was a figurative mark featuring a bottle of beer containing the words NEGRA MODELO for products in Classes 25, 32 and 42. The opponent already held a national registration for the word mark MODELO for goods in Classes 25 and 32.

* Case T-296/02 Lidl Stiftung v OHIM - REWE-Zentral, in which the owner of a national registration of the national figurative trade mark LINDERHOF for products in Class 33 appealed against the Third Board of Appeal's dismissal of his appeal against the Opposition Division's rejection of his opposition to an application to register as a Community trademark the word LINDENHOF for products in Class 32.

The IPKat looks forward to sharing these goodies with you once the rulings are posted.
CFI FORTHCOMING TRADE MARK ATTRACTIONS CFI FORTHCOMING TRADE MARK ATTRACTIONS Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, February 11, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.