SILLY NAMES, SILLIER PATENT?

The IPKat found this curiosity via Snark Hunting the naming and branding blog. Zenmark Brand Engineering, Inc. says the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has "received and acknowledged" its patent application for a "unique and innovative creative development process" in the area of product, service and company naming. It claims this process has been proved to "revolutionise the naming industry" by applying a "rigorous and repeatable methodology to the often unstructured and undisciplined process of brand name creation". It adds:
"In today's competitive economy, it is increasingly difficult for companies to find unique, effective and legally available names. Unlike most naming firms, Zenmark takes a disciplined, engineering-based approach that achieves the highest quality creative product with an intense screening process. This process assures that Zenmark's clients are presented with high-quality choices that have the highest legal likelihood of being available to put into use. ... Our engineered approach combines art with science, which is entirely new to naming. By adding scientific scrutiny to the process of legal analysis, linguistic assessment and market testing, it gives clients more confidence that the names they ultimately choose will be the ideal vessels for their verbal identity and the most solid infrastructure for building brand equity".
The IPKat raises a quizzical whisker at this. He recalls that Interbrand was using computers to aid its generation of brands back in the 1980s (when Interbrand was still called Novamark) and wonders how Zenmark claims to have made an advance over the prior art. Snark Hunting lists some names created by Zenmark together with those of some of its competitors ("The names of the naming companies are in bold; the names each has created using their own process are not so bold") and adds:
"On what evidence will the patent office decide that Zenmark Brand Engineering, Inc. has a process that is uniquely different than its competitors? By asking all of the naming companies listed above to supply their processes for comparison? Unlikely. Surely not from comparing the resulting names, as that would lead anyone to the conclusion that all of these naming companies have exactly the same process in place".
Some Zenmark names here: Amicore, Afaria, Applimation, Azenity, Certiport, Coalogic, Palaterra, Phyve.
More silly names here and here
SILLY NAMES, SILLIER PATENT? SILLY NAMES, SILLIER PATENT? Reviewed by Jeremy on Sunday, May 08, 2005 Rating: 5

5 comments:

  1. Its a shame that companies need to outsource to others to "find unique, effective and legally available names". Do they not have a modicum of creativity themselves?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Consider the power of being able to create incoming links to your site any time you want them...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi, This a great blog, I have a blog about
    adsense google google googleadsensesearch.com,
    It covers just about everything on adsense google google googleadsensesearch.com,
    Please visit it sometime :-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. What If This Could All Happen Automatically,
    with a simple push of a button.....

    ReplyDelete
  5. a lot of premium products and services being offered for free. What’s best is that there is a seemingly

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.