The team is joined by GuestKats Mirko Brüß, Rosie Burbidge, Nedim Malovic, Frantzeska Papadopolou, Mathilde Pavis, and Eibhlin Vardy
InternKats: Rose Hughes, Ieva Giedrimaite, and Cecilia Sbrolli
SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Hayleigh Bosher (Book Review Editor), and Tian Lu (Asia Correspondent).

Wednesday, 1 June 2005


The Uradex case (Case C-169/05 URADEX SCRL v Union Professionelle de la Radio et de la Télédistribution (RTD) and Société Intercommunale pour la Diffusion de la Télévision (BRUTELE) has just been referred to the European Court of Justice by the Cour de Cassation de Belgique for a preliminary ruling on the question:
"Must Article 9(2) of Council Directive 93/83 on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission be interpreted as meaning that, where a collecting society is deemed to be mandated to manage the rights of a copyright owner or holder of related rights who has not transferred the management of his rights to a collecting society, that society does not have the power to exercise that rightholder's right to grant or refuse authorisation to a cable operator for cable retransmission, since it is mandated only to manage the pecuniary aspects of that rightholder's rights?".

How retransmission has changed our lives

In other words, are satellite and cable retransmission collecting societies just that -- recipients of rights owners' money -- or can they say "non" to cable operators?

The IPKat suspects that this reference will go in favour of the cable operators, but -- knowing how the ECJ can rewrite the text of Directives -- he won't prejudge the issue.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

What If This Could All Happen Automatically,
with a simple push of a button.....

Subscribe to the IPKat's posts by email here

Just pop your email address into the box and click 'Subscribe':