SOUR REACTION TO "STUFFED LEMON" CTM APPEAL

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) announced this morning that it has dismissed the appeal of the Community trade mark applicant in Case C-286/04 P Eurocermex SA v OHIM. The application was for registration of a three-dimensional trade mark constituted by the shape of a long-neck bottle into the neck of which a slice of lemon with a green skin was plugged, in respect of beers and various services. The application was roundly rejected by the examiner, the Board of Appeal and the Court of First Instance (CFI) for the reasons that the alleged sign was devoid of distinctive character and that it had not acquired distinctiveness through use.

Today it was the turn of the ECJ to reject it. That court quite correctly confined its comments to a review of the rectitude of the CFI's analysis and did not do what the IPKat hoped it might. It could have said
"how on earth can this so-called trade mark ever function as a trade mark, distinguishing those goods from those of other manufacturers, when it is applied to the goods in question AFTER those goods have been disposed of by the trade mark owner and may or may not be applied to those goods once they are in the hands of bar employees or ultimate consumers?"
SOUR REACTION TO "STUFFED LEMON" CTM APPEAL SOUR REACTION TO "STUFFED LEMON" CTM APPEAL Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, June 30, 2005 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. Does anyone know if there have been any attempts to register this mark in any other jurisdictions and if so, have they been successful?

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.