The team is joined by GuestKats Mirko Brüß, Rosie Burbidge, Nedim Malovic, Frantzeska Papadopolou, Mathilde Pavis, and Eibhlin Vardy
InternKats: Rose Hughes, Ieva Giedrimaite, and Cecilia Sbrolli
SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Hayleigh Bosher (Book Review Editor), and Tian Lu (Asia Correspondent).

Tuesday, 11 October 2005


The Mercury News reports that the European Court of Human Rights has ruled that trade marks count as property for the purposes of the right to peaceful enjoyment of property (Article 1, Protocol 1, European Convention on Human Rights), but that pending applications for trade marks do not.

In a press release, the court said:

"The Court held that, while it was clear that a trademark amounted to a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 ... this was not the case until final registration of the application in question…Prior to such registration, applicants did have a hope of acquiring such a "possession", but not a legally-protected legitimate expectation."
The decision comes in the context of the US v Czech Budweiser saga. Anheuser claimed that the Portugeuse decision to allow the Czech company to use the mark under the 1986 treaty between the Czech Republic and Portugal, which protects registered designations of origin infringed the US company’s right to peaceful enjoyment in property of its trade mark.

The IPKat suspected that trade marks counted as property under the ECHR, but he’s glad to see it confirmed. He agrees that applications can’t be considered to be legally protected legitimate expectations, since this would ignore the possibility of applied-for marks being opposed on relative and absolute grounds.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Consider the power of being able to create incoming links to your site any time you want them...

Subscribe to the IPKat's posts by email here

Just pop your email address into the box and click 'Subscribe':