The team is joined by GuestKats Mirko Brüß, Rosie Burbidge, Nedim Malovic, Frantzeska Papadopolou, Mathilde Pavis, and Eibhlin Vardy
InternKats: Rose Hughes, Ieva Giedrimaite, and Cecilia Sbrolli
SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Hayleigh Bosher (Book Review Editor), and Tian Lu (Asia Correspondent).

Monday, 27 November 2006


The BBC obviously knows something we don’t. The IPKat almost choked on his (metaphorical) porridge on hearing James Naughtie’s spectacular misunderstanding of copyright during this morning’s Today programme. Cutting through the kitty litter, the upshot was that the BBC is predicting that the Gowers Review will not recommend extending copyright in sound recordings beyond their current 50 year term of protection, despite the calls of luminaries such as Sir Cliff Richard and Jethro Tull.

Mr Gowers (left) thinking about what to write in his long-awaited report

What the IPKat wants to know is, when will the Gowers Review actually be published?
What Merpel wants to know is, how did the BBC get inside information about the contents of the report?

Listen to the piece here (7.40 slot)
Read about the issue on another BBC site here.


David said...

If the story is true, I'm glad to see that sense was seen, and that an extension to the (already too long) copyright on sound recordings was not recommended. It is a bit depressing though that the BBC report concentrated on arguments about artists not receiving royalties once copyright in the sound recordings expires. This is, of course, almost entirely wrong, as anyone who knows the slightest bit about copyright will know.

Anonymous said...

To answer your question how did the BBC know; "a well-placed government source has said" from

or a leak by any other name...

Subscribe to the IPKat's posts by email here

Just pop your email address into the box and click 'Subscribe':