Posthumous pleasure for performers


In case you missed it, the European Parliament website yesterday published this item (thanks, Hugo Cox, for forwarding the link):
"Music copyright to be extended to 70 years for performers

Copyright term for music recordings must be extended from 50 years to 70 years, says legislation adopted on Thursday by the European Parliament. By adopting the report by Brian Crowley (IE, UEN) with 377 votes in favour, 178 against and 37 abstentions, MEPs voted to increase the term of copyright protection to ensure that performers continue to receive royalties for 70 years from the first publication or performance of their song.

The European Commission had previously proposed an extension of the copyright protection up to 95 years. According to Mr Crowley, the compromise reached by the Parliament on 70 years takes into account Council's resistance and would facilitate an agreement with national governments [this remains to be seen ...].

A fund for session musicians

The increased copyright protection would also benefit producers, thanks to additional revenues deriving from the extension.

A dedicated fund for session musicians was also supported by the Parliament. This fund would be financed by contributions from producers, who would be obliged to set aside for this purpose, at least once a year, at least 20% of the revenues gained from the proposed extension of copyright term [this should make a bit of work for the accountants, too, particularly where revenue results from compilations containing works in which there is  (i) regular copyright, (ii) extended copyright and (iii) no copyright]. This fund will reward those session musicians who gave up their rights when signing the contract for their performance.

MEPs amend a provision relating to this fund so as to give collecting societies, which represent performers' and producers' interests, the right to administer the annual supplementary remuneration.

"Clean slate" clause to ensure extension benefits performers

To ensure that performers fully enjoy the additional royalties deriving from copyright extension, MEPs amend the original text so as to prevent the use of previous contractual agreements to deduct money from the additional royalties [retrospective deprivation of contractual and proprietary entitlements? Call for the European Convention on Human Rights!].

Possibility to renegotiate contracts

An amendment approved by MEPs allows performers to renegotiate the contracts concluded before the entry into force of this legislation, 50 years after the first publication of their recording.

Copyright extension for audiovisual works, too?

The Parliament also asks the Commission to launch an impact assessment of the situation in the European audiovisual sector by January 2010, with a view to deciding whether a similar copyright extension would benefit the audiovisual world [depends what you mean by "benefit the audiovisual world", the IPKat supposes. There does not appear to be an obvious consensus within that world as to what will be of benefit to it].

"Use it or lose it" clause

According to the approved legislation, if producers, 50 years after the publication of a phonogram, do not make it available to the public [does this mean "continue to make it available? If it's been published, it has presumably been made available], performers can ask to terminate the contract they signed to transfer their rights to the label.

The producer has one year to make the recording available to the public, failing this his rights will expire.

Review legislation after three years

Finally, MEPs ask the Commission to submit three years after the entry into force of the new legislation an assessment of its application with particular regard to the digital market.

Member States will have two years to transpose the new legislation.

Current legislation on copyright

Under current EU laws, recorded musical performances are protected for a maximum of 50 years. This means that over a period of 50 years, performers receive remuneration for each time their work is played on the air. After 50 years, artists lose control over the use of their works and no longer receive this income.

Composers already enjoy copyright protection for 70 years after their death [Says the IPKat, I don't suppose they enjoy it at all: they're dead, if that means anything to EU legislators]".
Famous old joke about what composers do after they die here, here and here
Posthumous pleasure for performers Posthumous pleasure for performers Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, April 24, 2009 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. Oh sigh! This is not a comment on the legislation but a weary response to the lack of accurate terminology even among the legislaters. Maybe the European Parliament could have someone proof read their press releases. The extension of term applies for 70 years from the first publication or performance of their recorded performance. Not their song - that is the composer. Oy vey! No wonder the public and the prospective user get confused about all this if there is no understanding of the difference between the copyright in a musical composition, the copyright in a sound recording and the rights attaching to a performance and the performer. I despair.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.