![]() |
| As an aside, Charlie Chaplin's movie The Great Dictator was banned in several countries |
Friday, 18 May 2012
Will over-exposure set in? A postscript to the "Mein Kampf" copyright saga
By way of background: contrary to popular belief (in Germany), Mein
Kampf is not banned in Germany but can be freely re-published
when the copyright held by the Bavarian State government (more precisely the
Finance Ministry) is set to expire in 2015 - 70 years after Hitler's death. The
Bavarian State government took over the rights of the main Nazi party publishing
house Eher-Verlag after the end of World War II as part of the Allies'
de-Nazification programme.
The Regional Court of Munich I (LG München I) in March 2012 confirmed
its preliminary injunction of 25 January 2012 and stopped the publication of this annotated version (see Monika Bruss's excellent summary of this decision on the 1709 Blog here. Subsequently, in what appears to be a never ending story, Bavaria's Finance Minister
Markus Söder in April then announced that the Munich-based Münchener Institut für Zeitgeschichte (Institute of
Contemporary History, "IfZ") would soon publish an annotated version of the
book as well as an edition for use in (Bavarian) schools. This was reported before (see the IPKat here)
but Mr Söder's approval of this edition is newsworthy.
Not this is not enough, it appears. Now the magazine Der Spiegel reports that the German Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (BPD), a governmental political education organisation, plans to
prepare a special annotated edition of Mein Kampf to be used in
German schools. The BPD's director,
Thomas Krüger, is cited as saying that today's youth would most likely stop
reading the book after a few pages and would wonder "what kind of
weirdo" the author was (presumably if the book was written today, Merpel
feels obliged to add).
Some German commentators argue that all this is going too far and that the
book is receiving far too much publicity, with potentially negative consequences
bearing in mind its underlying ideology. Others
argue that whoever wanted to read the book will have found a way to do so by
now.
While this Kat one the hand thinks it may not be a bad a idea to
demystify the book, she is still very much against having its content spread. Having
said that, this Kat also noticed that, while she got excited about Mr Söder's
announcement in April when she first read about it ("hey, another development!"),
she very soon forgot about it completely and never finished her initial IPKat
posting … maybe all this publicity has another effect on potential readers:
overexposure, leading to consequent fatigue.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




No comments:
Post a Comment