Did you chase your tail last week and miss the IPKat?
Cheer up and read the 119th edition of Never Too Late.
 |
Whaaat, is it Wednesday already?
|
A
round-up post of some highlights from IPKat’s cousin blogs.
Neil
Wilkof reflections about how to understand the possible threat to IP with
globalization and free trade under attack.
Eleonora Rosati
discusses the compatibility with EU law of the new French law on freedom of
creation, architecture and cultural heritage.
Eleonora
also analyzes the Digital Economy Bill 2016 (still at Committee stage), which
contains criminal liability, potentially a 10-year prison sentence for unauthorised
communication to the public ("does it apply even for a
trivial infringement?).
A
round-up post of week’s news and forthcoming events.
GuestKat
Rosie Burbidge recaps the annual IBIL and MARQUES event, which enabled
attendees to learn first-hand about daily life at the courts.
David
Brophy discusses this case, which dealt with jurisdiction over a UK/ EU
trademark infringement and passing-off dispute, when the damages incurred and
the acts of infringement took place in two different countries.
Darren
Smyth covers the scheme launched by the Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) that
is designed to provide free legal representation to small business and
individuals on IP litigation issues.
GuestKat Eibhlin
Vardy discusses this case in which the Ninth Chamber of the General Court of the
European Union dismissed the action for annulment of the Commission decision that
‘pay-for-delay’ agreements between Lundbeck and generic companies breach EU competition
rules.
PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATE
Never
Too Late 118 [week ending on Sunday 16 October] | Rome
Court of First Instance rules that copyright exceptions for news reporting and
criticism/review do not apply to entertainment TV programmes | It's a gas! The
Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics | Around the Brexit Blogs and Related Events
| Is there a competition law issue lurking on the horizon of cloud computing? |
Thursday Thingies | Do declarations of non-infringement work for trade mark
litigants? | A close look at survey methodology for proof of acquired
distinctiveness | BGH rules for patentees on appeal –
again| A croissant-doughnut by any other name| General Court confirms
that body-builder silhouette cannot be registered as a trade mark for
nutritional supplements| The proposed press publishers' right: is it really worth
all this noise? | Servier successful before
Henderson J in introducing defence based on the Department of Health's
prescribing/reimbursement practices | Can
the Curve combat piracy? | Academics
stress importance of preserving consistency and integrity of EU framework on
content monitoring
Never
too late 117 [week ending on Sunday 9 October] | The Commission's DSMS and CJEU
case law: what relationship? | Generic marks as valuable commercial information
| Other people's computers | Compared to Svensson, GS Media is not that bad
after all | Introducing our new InternKats! | C-223/15: no EU-wide confusion,
no EU-wide injunction
Never too late 116 [week
ending on Sunday 2 October] | Book
Review: WTO Dispute Settlement and the TRIPS Agreement | The IPKat team news:
new arrivals and farewells | Brexit - who has the power to change UK law? |
Book review: Computer Crimes and Digital Investigations | European business
urge continued UK involvement in UPC on eve of Competitiveness Council meeting
| Wednesday Whimsies | Book review: Global Governance of Intellectual Property
in the 21st Century
Never
too late 115 [week ending on Sunday 25 September] | Book Review: Arnold reviews “Economic Approaches to Intellectual
Property” | The English approach to obviousness – It all depends on the
facts? | AIPPI Congress Report 3: Biosimilars – similar but
different? | AIPPI Congress Report 4: Lawyers who lunch – role of experts
in litigation and the EPO in the 21st Century | Law & Economics
– The Italian Edition | Friday Fantasies | Latest thoughts about Brexit and the
UPC | Eye ‘should’ve’ done that! – Specsavers nears approval to trade mark
single word “should’ve” & “shouldve” | A song of Ice and Ice | ChIPs Global
Summit Report 3: Congratulations – your patent has been allowed, when is it
finally final?
No comments:
Post a Comment